| Anti-Biotic
Drugs
An antibiotic is a drug that kills
or slows the growth of bacteria. Antibiotics are one
class of "antimicrobials", a larger group
which also includes anti-viral, anti-fungal, and anti-parasitic
drugs. They are relatively harmless to the host, and
therefore can be used to treat infections. The term
originally described only those formulations derived
from living organisms, but is now applied also to synthetic
antimicrobials, such as the sulfonamides. Antibiotics
are small molecules with a molecular weight less than
2000 and they are not enzymes.
Unlike previous treatments for infections, which included
poisons such as strychnine, antibiotics were labelled
"magic bullets": drugs which targeted disease
without harming the host. Antibiotics are not effective
in viral, fungal and other nonbacterial infections,
and individual antibiotics vary widely in their effectiveness
on various types of bacteria. Some specific antibiotics
(called "narrow-spectrum antibiotics") target
either gram-negative or gram-positive bacteria, and
others are more wide-spectrum antibiotics. The effectiveness
of individual antibiotics varies with the location of
the infection and the ability of the antibiotic to reach
this site. Oral antibiotics are the simplest approach
when effective, with intravenous antibiotics reserved
for more serious cases. Antibiotics may sometimes be
administered topically, as with eyedrops or ointments.
Side effects
Side effects range from slight headache to a major
allergic reaction. One of the more common side effects
is diarrhea, which results from the antibiotic disrupting
the balance of intestinal flora, the "good bacteria"
that dwell inside the human digestive system. Other
side effects can result from interaction between the
antibiotic and other drugs, such as elevated risk of
tendon damage from administration of a quinolone antibiotic
with a systemic corticosteroid.
Antibiotic misuse
Common forms of antibiotic misuse include taking an
inappropriate antibiotic, in particular the use of antibacterials
for viral infections like the common cold, and failure
to take the entire prescribed course of the antibiotic,
usually because the patient feels better before the
infecting organism is completely eradicated. In addition
to treatment failure, these practices can result in
antibiotic resistance.
In the United States, a vast quantity of antibiotics
is routinely included as low doses in the diet of healthy
farm animals, as this practice has been proved to make
animals grow faster. Opponents of this practice, however,
point out the likelihood that it also leads to antibiotic
resistance, frequently in bacteria that are known to
also infect humans, although there has been little or
no evidence as yet of such transfer of antibiotic resistance
actually occurring.
Antibiotic resistance
One side effect of misusing antibiotics is the development
of antibiotic resistance by the infecting organisms,
similar to the development of pesticide resistance in
insects. Evolutionary theory of genetic selection requires
that as close as possible to 100% of the infecting organisms
be killed off to avoid selection of resistance; if a
small subset of the population survives the treatment
and is allowed to multiply, the average susceptibility
of this new population to the compound will be much
less than that of the original population, since they
have descended from those few organisms which survived
the original treatment. This survival often results
from an inheritable resistance to the compound, which
was infrequent in the original population but is now
much more frequent in the descendants thus selected
entirely from those originally infrequent resistant
organisms.
Antibiotic resistance has become a serious problem
in both the developed and underdeveloped nations. By
1984 half the people with active tuberculosis in the
United States had a strain that resisted at least one
antibiotic. In certain settings, such as hospitals and
some child-care locations, the rate of antibiotic resistance
is so high that the normal, low cost antibiotics are
virtually useless for treatment of frequently seen infections.
This leads to more frequent use of newer and more expensive
compounds, which in turn leads inexorably to the rise
of resistance to those drugs, and a never-ending ever-spiraling
race to discover new and different antibiotics ensues,
just to keep us from losing ground in the battle against
infection. The fear is that we will eventually fail
to keep up in this race, and the time when people did
not fear life-threatening bacterial infections will
be just a memory of a golden era.
Another example of selection is Staphylococcus aureus,
which could be treated successfully with penicillin
in the 1940s and 1950s. At present, nearly all strains
are resistant to penicillin, and many are resistant
to nafcillin, leaving only a narrow selection of drugs
such as vancomycin useful for treatment. The situation
is worsened by the fact that genes coding for antibiotic
resistance can be transferred between bacteria, making
it possible for bacteria never exposed to an antibiotic
to acquire resistance from those which have. The problem
of antibiotic resistance is worsened when antibiotics
are used to treat disorders in which they have no efficacy,
such as the common cold or other viral complaints, and
when they are used widely as prophylaxis rather than
treatment (as in, for example, animal feeds), because
this exposes more bacteria to selection for resistance.
Beyond antibiotics
Unfortunately, the comparative ease of finding compounds
which safely cured bacterial infections proved much
harder to duplicate with respect to fungal and viral
infections. Antibiotic research led to great strides
in our knowledge of basic biochemistry and to the current
biological revolution; but in the process it was discovered
that the susceptibility of bacteria to many compounds
which are safe to humans is based upon significant differences
between the cellular and molecular physiology of the
bacterial cell and that of the mammalian cell. In contrast,
despite the seemingly huge differences between fungi
and humans, the basic biochemistries of the fungal cell
and the mammalian cell are much more similar; so much
so that there are few therapeutic opportunities for
compounds to attack a fungal cell which will not harm
a human cell. Similarly, we know now that viruses represent
an incredibly minimal intracellular parasite, being
stripped down to a few genes worth of DNA or RNA and
the minimal molecular equipment needed to enter a cell
and actually take over the machinery of the cell to
produce new viruses. Thus, the great bulk of viral metabolic
biochemistry is not merely similar to human biochemistry,
it actually is human biochemistry, and the possible
targets of antiviral compounds are restricted to the
relatively very few components of the actual virus itself.
Back to Top
|